FW: Almost ...
Guus Sliepen
guus at sliepen.warande.net
Wed May 24 19:34:28 CEST 2000
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Matthijs Hoosemans wrote:
> now you can ping from anywhere in A to router B
> and from router B to anywhere in A
> only the netwerk behind B is unreachable.
> If I look at the routing tables to the tap0 device
> I see that in both tables there's the line
> 10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 tap0
> must this line in routing Table A not be
> 10.2.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 tap0
> (or maybe the other way around).
Ah, I didn't see that because your route command showed names instead of
numbers.
With tinc you have the ENTIRE vpn network (10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 for you) and
the subnets on that network (10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 and
10.2.0.0/255.255.255.0 as you said). The tap devices and routes should
represent the entire network. Tinc itself will distinguish between the
subnets and route appropiately.
So: you should only use routes 10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 tap0.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Guus Sliepen.
-
Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Tinc site: http://ftp.nl.linux.org/pub/linux/tinc/
More information about the Tinc
mailing list