Question about building tinc pre4
Guus Sliepen
guus at sliepen.warande.net
Wed Jun 20 13:07:18 CEST 2001
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:29:26PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> Cris van Pelt wrote:
> > tinc should, of course, figure this out for itself by checking for dlopen()
> > in -ldl.
>
> >From the ChangeLog:
> 2000-11-23 10:30 Guus Sliepen <guus at sliepen.warande.net>
>
> * autogen.sh, configure.in:
> - Don't link with -ldl anymore
>
>
> libcrypto.a uses libdl calls, but tinc doesn't. Somewhere along the
> line, something went wrong.
Well, the problem is that static libraries apparently do not include
dependencies on other libraries like shared ones do. I don't know if
libcrypto.a should have been linked with libdl.a or not... We can put the -ldl
back in, but it would make no sense if you would build a shared version of
tinc. Anyone here who thinks he knows what the best thing to do is?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus at sliepen.warande.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20010620/9650ffc9/attachment.pgp
More information about the Tinc
mailing list