tinc Digest, Vol 44, Issue 5

[Viktors Žilinskis]

Hi!

Thanks again - VPN works perfectly at office as well! :)

If I run ping -v 10.20.40.2 on server as an unprivileged user I get the
following:
### ###
PING 10.20.40.2 (10.20.40.2): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=11.862 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=184.832 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=798.177 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=10.659 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=23.155 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=256.141 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=168.339 ms
^C
--- 10.20.40.2 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.659/207.595/798.177/257.548 ms
### ###

If I run the same as a root, I get:
### ###
PING 10.20.40.2 (10.20.40.2): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=13.039 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=148.408 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=72.130 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=12.023 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=101.818 ms
36 bytes from 120.Red-83-34-193.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net (83.34.193.120):
Destination Port Unreachable
Vr HL TOS  Len   ID Flg  off TTL Pro  cks      Src      Dst
 4  5  00 9300 1476   0 0000  30  11 3159 XX.XXX.XXX.XXX  83.34.193.120
UDP: from port 2885, to port 24052 (decimal)

64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=103.037 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=57.165 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=7 ttl=128 time=287.862 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=8 ttl=128 time=206.765 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=9 ttl=128 time=144.485 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=10 ttl=128 time=47.450 ms
36 bytes from 143.Red-83-32-16.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net (83.32.16.143):
Destination Port Unreachable
Vr HL TOS  Len   ID Flg  off TTL Pro  cks      Src      Dst
 4  5  00 9300 177d   0 0000  30  11 df3d XX.XXX.XXX.XXX  83.32.16.143
UDP: from port 2885, to port 18312 (decimal)

64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=11 ttl=128 time=15.269 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=12 ttl=128 time=198.215 ms
64 bytes from 10.20.40.2: icmp_seq=13 ttl=128 time=14.032 ms
^C
--- 10.20.40.2 ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 14 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 12.023/101.550/287.862/82.758 ms
### ###

When I run netstat -r, I get the following (real server address substituted
with X):
### ###
Routing tables

Internet:
Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire
default            bf-1-1-gw.net.bf.r UGS         1  6766487    rl0
10.20.40/24        link#3             UC          0        0   tap0 =>
10.20.40&0xa142802 255.255.255.0      UGS         0     3656    rl0
10.20.40.1         00:bd:7f:71:0f:00  UHLW        1        6    lo0
10.20.40.2         00:bd:7f:71:0f:ff  UHLW        1      106   tap0    541
XX.XXX.XXX/24      link#1             UC          0        0    rl0
brake.bf.rtu.lv    00:10:83:fc:cb:b2  UHLW        1        1    rl0   1195
XX.XXX.XXX.XXX     00:08:54:08:dc:96  UHLW        1      133    lo0
bf-1-1-gw.net.bf.r 00:15:17:14:85:a5  UHLW        2        0    rl0   1200
localhost          localhost          UH          0      144    lo0
### ###

Route monitor does not give anything new when pinging 10.20.40.2.


Best Regards,
Viktors Zilinskis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20080328/45d8c212/attachment.htm