NFS4 over tinc hangs
Guus Sliepen
guus at tinc-vpn.org
Sun Mar 11 19:39:31 CET 2012
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:46:27PM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> >> The hbt, br0 (i.e., eth1 and vnet0) interfaces share a common
> >> 192.168.1.0/24 network. Proxy ARP is enabled for br0 and hbt.
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, why do you use proxy ARP in this case instead of adding
> > hbt to the bridge? I assume you are you using Mode = switch?
>
> No, I am using Mode = router. I used the switch configuration in the
> past, but from the tinc docs I got the impression that proxy ARP +
> router is the preferred option if I do not need to tunnel broadcast or
> non-IP packets.
Well, if you don't need the broadcast packets and/or non-IP packets, and you do
not already have a bridge setup, then it is much easier to just set up proxy
ARP. But since you already have a bridge interface it would have been more easy
for you to add the VPN interface to it :)
> Are you saying that adding hbt to the bridge, disabling proxy ARP and
> running with Mode = switch would be the better option for me? Then I'll
> do that.
In theory it should not matter in your case. But you can try it out if you
want.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20120311/7bc12b37/attachment.pgp>
More information about the tinc
mailing list