"Unauthorized request" messages after tinc update

Nikolaus Rath Nikolaus at rath.org
Thu Aug 29 17:19:55 CEST 2013


Guus Sliepen <guus-NnCthlHDAqpg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:43:25AM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> This is what it looks like with -d 4. I also updated the server tinc
>> version to 1.0.22 now:
>> 
>> Aug 28 15:20:38 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Expiring symmetric keys
>> Aug 28 15:20:38 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Sending KEY_CHANGED to everyone (BROADCAST): 14 3296e87f ebox
>> Aug 28 15:39:04 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Connection from 198.228.212.252 port 32534
>> Aug 28 15:39:04 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Sending ID to <unknown> (198.228.212.252 port 32534): 0 ebox 17
>> Aug 28 15:39:04 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Sending 10 bytes of metadata to <unknown> (198.228.212.252 port 32534)
>> Aug 28 15:39:04 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Got PING from <unknown> (198.228.212.252 port 32534): 8
>
> That's very strange. It looks like there is a PING message in a buffer
> somewhere that is being received by ebox instead of the ID message. I have
> never seen this before...
>
>> Aug 28 15:39:35 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Connection from 198.228.212.252 port 52274
>> Aug 28 15:39:35 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Sending ID to <unknown> (198.228.212.252 port 52274): 0 ebox 17
>> Aug 28 15:39:35 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Sending 10 bytes of metadata to <unknown> (198.228.212.252 port 52274)
>> Aug 28 15:39:35 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Flushing 10 bytes to <unknown> (198.228.212.252 port 52274)
>> Aug 28 15:39:35 ebox tinc.rath[2759]: Got ID from <unknown> (198.228.212.252 port 52274): 0 thinkpad 17
>
> Which version of tinc is thinkpad running? Could you run tincd there as well
> with -d4, and copy&paste the log from that one as well when the problem occurs?


Hmm. I just realized that I lied to you before. When these messages
started appearing, I wasn't just upgrading two clients from tinc 1.0.11
to tinc 1.0.16, but I also added a new client running tinc
1.0.19. "thinkpad" is the new client that I added, but this is the first
time that it triggered one of the "Unauthorized request" messages.


I tried to reproduce the problem, but it's not as easy as starting fresh
tinc instances with -d 4 on client and server. In that case everything
works smoothly. I guess I'll have to leave them running with -d 4 for a
while and wait for the message to appear...


Best,
Nikolaus


More information about the tinc mailing list