lower bound of prefixlength in host subnet ?

[Guus Sliepen]

On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:53:36PM +0100, Flynn Marquardt wrote:

> > Could it be that the Subnet declaration was on the last line of the
> > file? There is a bug in 1.0.13 (fixed in 1.0.14) that causes it to
> > ignore the last line of a config file if it doesn't end with a newline
> > character. You might have fixed it when you replaced it with two /9
> > Subnets. If so, try changing it back to one /8 again.
> I also thought on this potential source of problem (other daemons do
> often have this problem too)
> and already moved the line up - it did not help ...

Hm, I just checked myself and tinc 1.0.13 seems to accept /8 Subnets
just fine. Can you reproduce it and send me an exact copy of the config
file containing the /8 Subnet?

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
     Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20150206/7a050f61/attachment.sig>