AW: issue with tinc and libvirt / Network is already in use by interface tun0

[Sven-Haegar Koch]

On Sat, 5 Mar 2016, shad0wrunner at gmx.de wrote:

> Sorry, I don't get it. I thought the Subnet parameter is indented for
> routing local nets to the remote host.
> This way a remote host can access the provided  local nets.
> 
> What I have is my host A with vms (ips within 192.168.1.0/24).
> My host A has a bridge to the  vm's network. The bridge has the IP
> 192.168.1.1. Furthor more my host A has a tinc device tun0 with the IP
> 192.168.2.10.
> 
>  My host A has A static internet IP.
> 
> I want to connect Host B to Host A via tinc. Host B should be able to access
> all VM's within the network  192.168.1.0/24. To get this to work I have to
> create on both hosts a hostfile with the name A.conf containing the entries:
> 
> Address = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
> Subnet = 192.168.1.0/24
> Subnet = 192.168.2.10/32
> 
> right? Or am I wrong?

This sounds correct - but this only includes what tinc announces to the 
other sides.

But what is in your tinc-up script on host A?

Which IP really gets configured on the tun interface, and which routes 
added? I think here is the problem in your setup.

c'ya
sven-haegar

-- 
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.
- Ben F.