IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD

Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff stdin at niklaas.eu
Fri May 27 21:30:49 CEST 2016


Kevin Oberman [2016-05-27 12:02 -0700] :

> This is fine, but why not use link-local for the VPN links? That's the
> primary reason for them. (N.B. I am not aware of your architectural
> details, and ULAs for the VPNs might be appropriate.)

Is it? I didn't know that I can use link-local addresses for the VPN
too. How do I decide between link-local or unique-local addresses for
the VPN? What do I make the decision dependent on?

    Niklaas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20160527/d51a59a8/attachment.sig>


More information about the tinc mailing list