Aw: Re: very high traffic without any load

[Hamish Moffatt]

On 7/5/19 5:57 am, Christopher Klinge wrote:
> Hi,
> shouldn't these two rules work as well?
> ip route add <remote public ipv6>/64 via 1111:1::1
> ip route add <remote public ipv6>/0 dev<own internet interface>
> According to my knowledge thus far, linux should pick routes based on 
> specificity. Since /0 is more specific than /64, it should pick that 
> rule whenever the remote public ipv6 is targeted directly. For all 
> other ips in the remote host's subnet, it should pick the route 
> through the vpn. I tried this and it resulted in the same infinite 
> looping behaviour I experienced previously.


Did you mean /128 instead of /0? /0 is the entire internet.



Hamish

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20190507/ef444d51/attachment-0001.html>