<div dir="ltr">Please feel free to share your own benchmarks if any in the mean time.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Guus Sliepen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:guus@tinc-vpn.org" target="_blank">guus@tinc-vpn.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 08:42:20AM -0700, al so wrote:<br>
<br>
> Is there performance issue with Tinc compared to alternatives?<br>
<br>
</span>Performance depends on many variables, it is impossible to say "A is<br>
nn% faster/slower than alternative B". The best way to check which<br>
alternative has the best performance is to try them out yourself.<br>
<span class=""><br>
> Is it still single threaded?<br>
<br>
</span>Yes.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,<br>
Guus Sliepen <<a href="mailto:guus@tinc-vpn.org">guus@tinc-vpn.org</a>><br>
</font></span><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tinc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:tinc@tinc-vpn.org">tinc@tinc-vpn.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-<wbr>bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>