From: Etienne Dechamps <etienne@edechamps.fr>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 18:54:50 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Add MTU_INFO protocol message.
X-Git-Tag: release-1.1pre12~192
X-Git-Url: https://tinc-vpn.org/git/browse?a=commitdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;h=b1421b919090351e885ed3d06df67fb2eb69e765;hp=b1421b919090351e885ed3d06df67fb2eb69e765;p=tinc

Add MTU_INFO protocol message.

In this commit, nodes use MTU_INFO messages to provide MTU information.

The issue this code is meant to address is the non-trivial problem of
finding the proper MTU when UDP SPTPS relays are involved. Currently,
tinc has no idea what the MTU looks like beyond the first relay, and
will arbitrarily use the first relay's MTU as the limit. This will fail
miserably if the MTU decreases after the first relay, forcing relays to
fall back to TCP. More generally, one should keep in mind that relay
paths can be arbitrarily complex, resulting in packets taking "epic
journeys" through the graph, switching back and forth between UDP (with
variable MTUs) and TCP multiple times along the path.

A solution that was considered consists in sending standard MTU probes
through the relays. This is inefficient (if there are 3 nodes on one
side of relay and 3 nodes on the other side, we end up with 3*3=9 MTU
discoveries taking place at the same time, while technically only
3+3=6 are needed) and would involve eyebrow-raising behaviors such as
probes being sent over TCP.

This commit implements an alternative solution, which consists in
the packet receiver sending MTU_INFO messages to the packet sender.
The message contains an MTU value which is set to maximum when the
message is originally sent. The message gets altered as it travels
through the metagraph, such that when the message arrives to the
destination, the MTU value contained in the message can be used to
send packets while making sure no relays will be forced to fall back to
TCP to deliver them.

The operating principles behind such a protocol message are similar to
how the UDP_INFO message works, but there is a key difference that
prevents us from simply reusing the same message: the UDP_INFO message
only cares about relay-to-relay links (i.e. it is sent between static
relays and the information it contains only makes sense between two
adjacent static relays), while the MTU_INFO cares about the end-to-end
MTU, including the entire relay path. Therefore, UDP_INFO messages stop
when they encounter static relays, while MTU_INFO messages don't stop
until they get to the original packet sender.

Note that, technically, the MTU that is obtained through this mechanism
can be slightly pessimistic, because it can be lowered by an
intermediate node that is not being used as a relay. Since nodes have no
way of knowing whether they'll be used as dynamic relays or not (and
have no say in the matter), this is not a trivial problem. That said,
this is highly unlikely to result in noticeable issues in realistic
scenarios.
---