Current state of Tinc 1.1?

[Donald Pearson]

Is there a specific capability you are looking for or concern you have?

No doubt Gus can give details on the differences but if you're wondering if
1.0 will work for you we may be able to help with some more information.

Regards,
Donald

On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Alexander Ypema <alexanderypema at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> So as probably any Tinc user, I noticed there are two versions: 1.0 and
> 1.1. On the website is explained that 1.1 is the stepping stone for 2.0 and
> that it has a lot of neat features *planned*. However, in the
> repositories, one usually finds version 1.0, and since I'm someone who
> prefers having everything run through repositories instead of manually
> updated, I want to know if it's worth it, if it's actually in a usable
> state, and if any of the 'planned' features are implemented.
>
> In short, does anyone know what the current state of Tinc 1.1 is? Is it
> recommended to use it at all, or stay with 1.0 as provided in most distro
> repositories?
>
> I'm also asking this question over here:
> http://serverfault.com/questions/654053/current-state-of-tinc-1-1 ,
> someone suggested there I'd poke the mailing list :) Feel free to answer
> the question there if you think it's more appropriate.
> Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
> Alexander Ypema
>
> _______________________________________________
> tinc mailing list
> tinc at tinc-vpn.org
> http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20141222/c82ab390/attachment.html>