tinc bug (bogus connection)

[Guus Sliepen]

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:10:30PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:

> > Which branch did you check out? You should use the CABAL branch.
>  
>  oh, poot, _now_ he tells me :)

Well it says on the homepage that CABAL is the development branch... :)

> > 1.0.2_2? Our latest release is 1.0.1, so that can't be true.
> 
>  the _2 is a debian thing: it means the maintainer's second
>  published repackaging attempt of the N.N.N (in this case 1.0.1)
>  developer's 

Well the first part, 1.0.2, is bogus because it hasn't been released,
and second of all, the debian revision is separated from the upstream
version number by a dash (-), not an underscore (_). 

> > > "Cannot route packet: unknown IPv4 destination address 192.168.1.201"
> > 
> > That means you are missing a Subnet statement that covers that address.
> 
>  yes, i sort-of figured that out, sort-of.
>  
>  by switching off the security, i get a subnet added (but still no
>  data routed).

What do you mean, switching off the security?

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
    Guus Sliepen <guus at sliepen.eu.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20031106/c1b0d122/attachment.pgp