tinc bug (bogus connection)

[Guus Sliepen]

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:31:18AM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:

> i just compiled latest cvs: the bug is still there.

Which branch did you check out? You should use the CABAL branch.

> the diffs i have against what i got from cvs and what is
> debian 1.0.2_2 show that the only significant addition
> is of an AF_UNKNOWN and its use, and the use of a tinc-
> defined sockaddrfree (and copy?)

1.0.2_2? Our latest release is 1.0.1, so that can't be true.

> ... but i am still back to square one on the actual packet
> routing:
> 
> "Cannot route packet: unknown IPv4 destination address 192.168.1.201"

That means you are missing a Subnet statement that covers that address.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
    Guus Sliepen <guus at sliepen.eu.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20031106/ef8633dc/attachment.pgp